Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGRX
AEPCX vs FNGRX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGRX
AEPCX vs FNGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FNGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FNGRX (627M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than FNGRX: AEPCX (2.06) vs FNGRX (0.13). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGRX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FNGRX (18 years). AEPCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FNGRX (1.46). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FNGRX (25.70). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGRX: AEPCX (250) vs FNGRX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. FNGRX (-3.31). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.45 vs. FNGRX (-23.26).
| AEPCX | FNGRX | AEPCX / FNGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.37 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.272 | -0.354 | -924% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 627M | 22,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 0.13 | 1,574% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | -3.31 | -275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.46 | 9.60 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.45 | -23.26 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.26 | 69.41 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers