Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGZX
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.77
Change+$0.52 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.83
Change+$0.09 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets837.03M
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGZX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FNGZX (837M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FNGZX (1.84) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FNGZX (0.95). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: AEPCX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. FNGZX (7.72). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.86 vs. FNGZX (-0.54).
| AEPCX | FNGZX | AEPCX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.87 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.95 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.482 | 14.758 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 837M | 16,607% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.84 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 7.72 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.82 | 39.64 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.86 | -0.54 | -2,589% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.95 | 84.82 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement