Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGZX
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.85
Change+$0.41 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.39
Change+$0.36 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.6M
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGZX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FNGZX (836M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FNGZX (1.87) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FNGZX (0.95). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: AEPCX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). AEPCX (9.35) and FNGZX (9.08) have marching annual gain over last year. AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.17 vs. FNGZX (-1.73).
| AEPCX | FNGZX | AEPCX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.87 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.95 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.038 | 11.635 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 836M | 15,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.87 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 9.08 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.35 | 27.38 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.17 | -1.73 | -473% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.89 | 80.99 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement