Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGZX
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$58.17
Change-$0.66 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$18.67
Change-$0.17 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets889.15M
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGZX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FNGZX (889M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FNGZX (1.80) vs AEPCX (0.17). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FNGZX (0.95). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: AEPCX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). FNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. AEPCX (7.73). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.10 vs. FNGZX (3.29).
| AEPCX | FNGZX | AEPCX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.87 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.95 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.857 | 15.370 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 889M | 15,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.80 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 10.79 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.49 | 22.65 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.10 | 3.29 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.33 | 73.57 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement