Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FNGZX
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FNGZX
AEPCX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FNGZX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FNGZX (581M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than FNGZX: AEPCX (2.07) vs FNGZX (0.54). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: AEPCX (26 years) vs FNGZX (18 years). AEPCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FNGZX (0.96). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FNGZX (25.70). FNGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FNGZX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.15 vs. FNGZX (-6.16). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : -8.48 vs. FNGZX (-23.95).
| AEPCX | FNGZX | AEPCX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.87 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.96 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.041 | -1.432 | -422% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 581M | 24,096% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 0.54 | 385% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.15 | -6.16 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.32 | 18.64 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.48 | -23.95 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.12 | 61.15 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement