Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.25
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.17B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FZABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FZABX (1.6B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.59) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.81 vs. AEPCX (8.73). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.99 vs. AEPCX (12.92).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.476 | 22.876 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 1.6B | 8,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.59 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 9.81 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.02 | 58.17 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.92 | 23.99 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.97 | 64.58 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement