Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$58.83
Change-$0.31 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FZABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.58B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.63) vs AEPCX (0.17). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. AEPCX (8.73). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.28 vs. AEPCX (10.77).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.857 | 19.795 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.58B | 8,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.63 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 13.89 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | 40.73 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.77 | 25.28 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.39 | 48.83 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement