Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$55.53
Change+$0.28 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.73B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$28.25
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FZABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 129B vs. FZABX (1.44B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.77) vs AEPCX (0.34). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.92 vs. AEPCX (-1.26). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 35.77 vs. AEPCX (22.29).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.73 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.73 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.470 | 11.616 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129B | 1.44B | 8,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.77 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 5.92 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.29 | 28.66 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.29 | 35.77 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.31 | 38.73 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...