Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$56.50
Change-$0.76 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.41B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.41
Change-$0.38 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FZABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FZABX (1.52B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.69) vs AEPCX (0.32). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. AEPCX (2.57). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 33.24 vs. AEPCX (14.79).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.73 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.73 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.348 | 17.701 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 1.52B | 8,839% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.69 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 10.11 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.34 | 41.88 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | 33.24 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.82 | 47.81 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement