Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.44
Change+$0.30 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.93
Change+$0.23 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FZABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FZABX (1.55B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.64) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. AEPCX (7.59). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 21.00 vs. AEPCX (7.78).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.038 | 18.649 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 1.55B | 8,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.64 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 9.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 44.61 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.78 | 21.00 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.34 | 59.80 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement