Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$55.05
Change-$0.51 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.04B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$27.05
Change-$0.29 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FZABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FZABX (1.4B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.45) vs AEPCX (0.81). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FZABX (23.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.14 vs. AEPCX (0.68). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 14.31 vs. AEPCX (4.58).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.542 | 6.875 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 1.4B | 9,377% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.45 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.68 | 4.14 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.13 | 6.32 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.58 | 14.31 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.25 | 38.23 | 42% |