Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.88
Change+$0.19 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.04B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.44
Change+$0.16 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FZABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FZABX (1.6B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.59) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. AEPCX (12.10). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.85 vs. AEPCX (10.66).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.695 | 24.220 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 1.6B | 8,614% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.59 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.10 | 13.90 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | 54.25 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.66 | 23.85 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.65 | 62.47 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement