Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$51.54
Change+$0.22 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.82B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$26.49
Change+$0.22 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FZABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 120B vs. FZABX (1.39B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.84) vs AEPCX (0.35). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.37 vs. AEPCX (-4.80). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. AEPCX (17.28).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.73 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.73 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.252 | 3.793 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120B | 1.39B | 8,658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.84 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.80 | 2.37 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.20 | 7.72 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.28 | 30.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.63 | 31.27 | 18% |