Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.68
Change+$0.35 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.61
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FZABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.52B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FZABX (1.67) vs AEPCX (0.17). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. AEPCX (7.17). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.15 vs. AEPCX (8.82).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.73 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.502 | 20.940 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.52B | 8,864% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.67 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.17 | 11.40 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.17 | 34.52 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.82 | 23.15 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.76 | 52.30 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement