Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FZABX
AEPCX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FZABX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FZABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FZABX (1.87B). AEPCX pays higher dividends than FZABX: AEPCX (2.11) vs FZABX (1.52). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FZABX (13 years). AEPCX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.72). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FZABX (46.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FZABX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. AEPCX (4.09). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 7.08 vs. AEPCX (-9.69).
| AEPCX | FZABX | AEPCX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.72 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.72 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.869 | 12.994 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141B | 1.87B | 7,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.52 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.09 | 8.97 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.07 | 29.57 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.69 | 7.08 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.90 | 76.94 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement