Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNAX
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNAX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.33
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.06B
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.18
Change-$0.07 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.94M
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and NBNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. NBNAX (247M). NBNAX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NBNAX (0.80) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNAX: AEPCX (25 years) vs NBNAX (18 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NBNAX (1.34). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. NBNAX (8.25). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.89 vs. AEPCX (9.92).
| AEPCX | NBNAX | AEPCX / NBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.16 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.34 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.631 | 17.492 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 247M | 55,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.80 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 8.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.85 | 44.32 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.92 | 13.89 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.76 | 51.09 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement