Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs NBNAX
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNAX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$49.67
Change+$2.36 (+4.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$13.15
Change+$0.87 (+7.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.5M
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NBNAX (172M). NBNAX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NBNAX (0.88) vs AEPCX (0.35). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNAX: AEPCX (24 years) vs NBNAX (17 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than NBNAX (1.34). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.39 vs. AEPCX (-15.95). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. AEPCX (10.11).
| AEPCX | NBNAX | AEPCX / NBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.16 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.34 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.438 | -4.954 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 172M | 64,535% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.88 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.95 | -7.39 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.26 | -6.02 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.11 | 17.47 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.29 | 13.78 | -31% |