Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNAX
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNAX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$61.26
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.84B
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.26
Change-$0.10 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.74M
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. NBNAX (250M). NBNAX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NBNAX (0.80) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNAX: AEPCX (25 years) vs NBNAX (18 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NBNAX (1.34). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. NBNAX (8.09). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.25 vs. AEPCX (8.57).
| AEPCX | NBNAX | AEPCX / NBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.16 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.34 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.631 | 18.885 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 250M | 54,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.80 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.78 | 8.09 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.82 | 40.84 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.57 | 15.25 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.18 | 57.57 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement