Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPGX vs FCIRX
AEPGX vs FCIRX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FCIRX
AEPGX vs FCIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FCIRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Hold and FCIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FCIRX (483M). AEPGX pays higher dividends than FCIRX: AEPGX (2.53) vs FCIRX (0.51). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FCIRX: AEPGX (42 years) vs FCIRX (9 years). FCIRX (1.25) is less costly to investors than AEPGX (0.83). AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FCIRX (25.00). AEPGX (6%) and FCIRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. AEPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIRX: AEPGX (250) vs FCIRX (15000). FCIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. AEPGX (5.55). FCIRX return over 5 years is better than : 21.20 vs. AEPGX (-5.69).
| AEPGX | FCIRX | AEPGX / FCIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.20 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.25 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.578 | 4.375 | 59% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141B | 483M | 29,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 0.51 | 502% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 6.92 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.83 | 21.95 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.69 | 21.20 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.72 | N/A | - |