Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPGX vs FCIWX
AEPGX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FCIWX
AEPGX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FCIWX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Buy and FCIWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FCIWX (450M). AEPGX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: AEPGX (2.48) vs FCIWX (0.85). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPGX (42 years) vs FCIWX (9 years). FCIWX (0.89) is less costly to investors than AEPGX (0.83). AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FCIWX (25.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPGX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPGX (250). FCIWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. AEPGX (4.61). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 15.55 vs. AEPGX (-4.41).
| AEPGX | FCIWX | AEPGX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.80 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.89 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.924 | 2.006 | 345% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 450M | 31,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 0.85 | 293% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 5.89 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.47 | 28.62 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.41 | 15.55 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement