Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPGX vs HNCSX
AEPGX vs HNCSX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs HNCSX
AEPGX vs HNCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. HNCSX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Hold and HNCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. HNCSX (507M). AEPGX pays higher dividends than HNCSX: AEPGX (2.47) vs HNCSX (0.60). AEPGX was incepted earlier than HNCSX: AEPGX (42 years) vs HNCSX (20 years). HNCSX (1.31) is less costly to investors than AEPGX (0.83). AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HNCSX (36.00). HNCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPGX: HNCSX (0) vs AEPGX (250). HNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.42 vs. AEPGX (7.89). HNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.37 vs. AEPGX (-6.38).
| AEPGX | HNCSX | AEPGX / HNCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.27 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.239 | 11.549 | 28% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 507M | 28,205% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 0.60 | 412% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 21.42 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.57 | 57.98 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.38 | 21.37 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.65 | 117.65 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement