Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEUDX vs RMFCX
AEUDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts AEUDX vs RMFCX
AEUDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEUDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEUDX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. AEUDX (6.4B). AEUDX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: AEUDX (2.39) vs RMFCX (1.19). AEUDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: AEUDX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than AEUDX (0.59). AEUDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). AEUDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: AEUDX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. AEUDX (8.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. AEUDX (5.33).
| AEUDX | RMFCX | AEUDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.583 | 6.368 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 117B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 1.19 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 9.24 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.51 | 34.91 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.33 | 35.66 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.30 | 96.09 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement