Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEYCX vs RWMFX
AEYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AEYCX vs RWMFX
AEYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEYCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. AEYCX (1.96B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AEYCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs AEYCX (0.00). AEYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AEYCX (25 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AEYCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). AEYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AEYCX (2500). AEYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. RWMFX (7.92). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.49 vs. AEYCX (6.18).
| AEYCX | RWMFX | AEYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.31 | 532% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.31 | 532% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.886 | 5.991 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 7.92 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.47 | 33.64 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.18 | 26.49 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.23 | 86.15 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement