Advertisement
AEYE vs PGY
Which Stock Would AI Choose? AudioEye (AEYE) vs. Pagaya Technologies (PGY) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both AEYE and PGY have delivered similar year-to-date gains around 28%, reflecting resilience in tech sectors amid market volatility.
- PGY exhibits stronger recent momentum, with shares rising significantly in recent weeks, driven by securitization deals, while AEYE shows mixed results including some outperformance periods.
- PGY's larger scale ($1.3B TTM revenue, profitable EPS) contrasts with AEYE's niche focus ($40M revenue, ongoing losses), highlighting growth trade-offs.
- Recent analyst sentiment favors both with Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), but PGY has higher average price targets relative to current levels.
- AI trading bots on Tickeron highlight diverse strategies suitable for volatile markets, potentially aiding relative performance analysis.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines AEYE and PGY, two technology firms leveraging digital solutions in accessibility and financial services, respectively. Both have navigated recent market swings with notable year-to-date gains, drawing interest from growth-oriented traders and investors seeking exposure to AI-adjacent sectors. In the current environment of tech sector rotation and economic uncertainty, understanding their relative performance, business drivers, and sentiment shifts is key for portfolio positioning. This analysis draws on recent financial data and market developments to highlight contrasts in momentum, scale, and risk profiles.
AEYE Overview and Recent Performance
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) develops software for web content accessibility, helping businesses comply with digital standards for users with disabilities. The company serves enterprises, governments, and nonprofits through automated testing, fixes, and monitoring. In recent market activity, AEYE shares have traded around $7, within a 52-week range of $5.31-$16.39, with market cap near $90M. Performance has been mixed, including periods surpassing broader market returns with over 20% gains in recent weeks, alongside some dips amid sector pressures. Q4 2025 earnings beat estimates, boosting sentiment, though analysts adjusted price targets downward. TTM revenue stands at $40M with EPS of -$0.25, reflecting growth investments. Factors like Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) and forward P/E of 8.33 support positive outlooks, tempered by profitability challenges.
PGY Overview and Recent Performance
Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY) deploys AI-driven platforms to enhance lending decisions for banks and fintechs, offering tools like Decline Monetization and affiliate optimization. Shares recently closed near $15, in a 52-week range of $9.11-$44.99, with market cap over $1.2B. Recent weeks have seen robust gains, with monthly advances around 39% and weekly rises over 30%, outperforming peers. Key drivers include a $600M AAA-rated ABS deal and Q4 profitability, with TTM revenue of $1.3B and EPS of $0.93. Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) and securitization momentum have lifted sentiment, though earlier-year volatility persists in the cyclical lending space.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI-powered bots out of over 350 available on the platform, each trading thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, multi-agent AI/ML, and technical analysis, with timeframes from 5 minutes to days. Standout performers include Semiconductor bots with annualized returns up to +97%, win rates of 58-68%, profit factors over 1.9, and drawdowns under $26K, targeting tickers like NVDA, SOXL, and LRCX. Industrial and gold miner bots show +34-96% annualized gains. Selected for current market conditions like volatility in tech and semis, they offer risk-managed signals for copy trading. Traders can explore these to match styles with holdings like AEYE or PGY.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AEYE focuses on a stable niche in web accessibility compliance, driven by regulatory tailwinds, while PGY operates in dynamic AI lending with higher growth potential but cyclical risks tied to interest rates and credit markets. PGY dwarfs AEYE in scale—$1.3B vs. $40M revenue, positive vs. negative EPS—and valuation multiples like trailing P/E (16 vs. N/A) and price/sales (1 vs. 2.2). Recent momentum favors PGY amid securitization catalysts, contrasting AEYE's steadier but lower-volatility path. Risk factors include AEYE's losses and small-cap sensitivity versus PGY's debt exposure. Market sentiment leans toward PGY's profitability inflection, though both benefit from AI/tech exposure.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward PGY for its superior trend consistency, GAAP profitability, larger revenue base, and fresh catalysts like AAA securitizations, positioning it better for upside in fintech recovery. AEYE offers niche stability and earnings beats but trails in momentum and scale. Probabilistic edge to PGY amid recent relative strength, subject to broader market dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEYE is a StrongBuy and PGY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEYE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AEYE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEYE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEYE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AEYE (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.46% price change this week, while PGY (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEYE is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
PGY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-2.27% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| AEYE | PGY | AEYE / PGY | |
| Capitalization | 74.4M | 1.24B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 158K | 271M | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -39.339 | -27.823 | 141% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.47 | - |
| Revenue | 41.1M | 1.28B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 8.56M | 1.26B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 16.9M | 928M | 2% |
AEYE | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AEYE | PGY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 23 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
AEYE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEYE has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEYE jumps, then S could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEYE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEYE | 100% | -3.96% | ||
| S - AEYE | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| PATH - AEYE | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| DOCN - AEYE | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.06% | ||
| SNPS - AEYE | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| NTCT - AEYE | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
PGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGY has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PGY jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGY | 100% | -3.43% | ||
| AFRM - PGY | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| AEYE - PGY | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.96% | ||
| AIOT - PGY | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| AI - PGY | 47% Loosely correlated | -5.83% | ||
| TOST - PGY | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||