Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFCGX vs RERCX
AFCGX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts AFCGX vs RERCX
AFCGX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCGX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCGX is a Buy and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. AFCGX (200M). RERCX pays higher dividends than AFCGX: RERCX (2.37) vs AFCGX (1.03). AFCGX was incepted earlier than RERCX: AFCGX (7 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than AFCGX (0.75). AFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). AFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: AFCGX (0) vs RERCX (250). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. AFCGX (3.38). AFCGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.38 vs. RERCX (-9.62).
| AFCGX | RERCX | AFCGX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.12 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.12 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.458 | 5.714 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 2.37 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 10.15 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.12 | 23.26 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.38 | -9.62 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers