Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFCLX vs RERCX
AFCLX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts AFCLX vs RERCX
AFCLX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCLX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCLX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. AFCLX (209M). RERCX pays higher dividends than AFCLX: RERCX (2.37) vs AFCLX (0.00). AFCLX was incepted earlier than RERCX: AFCLX (10 years) vs RERCX (24 years). AFCLX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). AFCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFCLX: RERCX (250) vs AFCLX (2500). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. AFCLX (8.94). RERCX (-3.91) and AFCLX (-4.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AFCLX | RERCX | AFCLX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.638 | 6.672 | 55% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 13.33 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.38 | 25.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.01 | -3.91 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.93 | 58.14 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement