Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFCWX vs RERCX
AFCWX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts AFCWX vs RERCX
AFCWX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCWX vs. RERCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCWX is a Hold and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. AFCWX (191M). RERCX pays higher dividends than AFCWX: RERCX (2.45) vs AFCWX (0.00). AFCWX was incepted earlier than RERCX: AFCWX (10 years) vs RERCX (24 years). AFCWX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). AFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFCWX: RERCX (250) vs AFCWX (2500). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. AFCWX (1.18). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : -5.22 vs. AFCWX (-10.61).
| AFCWX | RERCX | AFCWX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.341 | 3.524 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 191M | 141B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | 7.44 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.15 | 16.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.61 | -5.22 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.78 | 42.79 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement