Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFCWX vs RERCX
AFCWX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts AFCWX vs RERCX
AFCWX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCWX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCWX is a StrongBuy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. AFCWX (188M). RERCX pays higher dividends than AFCWX: RERCX (2.38) vs AFCWX (0.00). AFCWX was incepted earlier than RERCX: AFCWX (10 years) vs RERCX (24 years). AFCWX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). AFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFCWX: RERCX (250) vs AFCWX (2500). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. AFCWX (-1.53). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.43 vs. AFCWX (-13.50).
| AFCWX | RERCX | AFCWX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.960 | 6.467 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.53 | 3.80 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.44 | 26.39 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.50 | -6.43 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.17 | 44.13 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers