Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFCWX vs RERCX
AFCWX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts AFCWX vs RERCX
AFCWX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCWX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCWX is a Buy and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. AFCWX (236M). RERCX pays higher dividends than AFCWX: RERCX (2.37) vs AFCWX (0.00). AFCWX was incepted earlier than RERCX: AFCWX (10 years) vs RERCX (24 years). AFCWX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). AFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RERCX (35.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFCWX: RERCX (250) vs AFCWX (2500). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.14 vs. AFCWX (5.73). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.51 vs. AFCWX (-4.52).
| AFCWX | RERCX | AFCWX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.12 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.484 | 11.446 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.73 | 14.14 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 30.44 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.52 | -3.51 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.32 | 56.24 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers