Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGFX vs RGAGX
AFGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts AFGFX vs RGAGX
AFGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGFX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AFGFX (1.96B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than AFGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs AFGFX (0.00). AFGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: AFGFX (11 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). AFGFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AFGFX (20.00). AFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: AFGFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). AFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. RGAGX (4.75). AFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.24 vs. RGAGX (17.74).
| AFGFX | RGAGX | AFGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.29 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.391 | 7.335 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 4.75 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.17 | 41.00 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.24 | 17.74 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.20 | 106.44 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement