Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGFX vs RGAGX
AFGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts AFGFX vs RGAGX
AFGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. AFGFX (2.07B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than AFGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs AFGFX (0.00). AFGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: AFGFX (10 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). AFGFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AFGFX (20.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGFX: RGAGX (250) vs AFGFX (2500000). AFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.57 vs. RGAGX (15.41). AFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.52 vs. RGAGX (27.14).
| AFGFX | RGAGX | AFGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.29 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.546 | 10.599 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.57 | 15.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.00 | 55.31 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.52 | 27.14 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.26 | 117.06 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement