Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGFX vs RGAHX
AFGFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts AFGFX vs RGAHX
AFGFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGFX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. AFGFX (1.88B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than AFGFX: RGAHX (0.40) vs AFGFX (0.00). AFGFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: AFGFX (11 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). AFGFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AFGFX (20.00). AFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: AFGFX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. AFGFX (-1.27). AFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.96 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| AFGFX | RGAHX | AFGFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.44 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.44 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.252 | 9.200 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.27 | 0.18 | -710% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.27 | 43.47 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 13.78 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.59 | 106.68 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers