Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGGX vs CSPAX
AFGGX vs CSPAX Comparison
Open Charts AFGGX vs CSPAX
AFGGX vs CSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGGX vs. CSPAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGGX is a Buy and CSPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AFGGX (129M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than AFGGX: CSPAX (0.62) vs AFGGX (0.00). AFGGX was incepted earlier than CSPAX: AFGGX (22 years) vs CSPAX (24 years). AFGGX (1.28) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. AFGGX (38.00). AFGGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGGX: CSPAX (250) vs AFGGX (1000). AFGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.06 vs. CSPAX (23.72). AFGGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.90 vs. CSPAX (-1.32).
| AFGGX | CSPAX | AFGGX / CSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.04 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.04 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.439 | 16.817 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.06 | 23.72 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.83 | 42.58 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.90 | -1.32 | -1,729% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.31 | 104.26 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement