Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs ANWFX
AFGZX vs ANWFX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs ANWFX
AFGZX vs ANWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. ANWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Hold and ANWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. AFGZX (21.3M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: ANWFX (1.15) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than ANWFX: AFGZX (13 years) vs ANWFX (18 years). AFGZX (1.88) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.92 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: ANWFX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. AFGZX (8.94). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.19 vs. AFGZX (-5.33).
| AFGZX | ANWFX | AFGZX / ANWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.51 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.51 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.320 | 6.549 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 13.64 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.69 | 42.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.33 | 17.19 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.45 | 126.22 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers