Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPFX
AFGZX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPFX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$32.45
Change-$0.44 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.2M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.17
Change-$0.42 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
AFGZX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. AFGZX (22.2M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPFX (0.70) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPFX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.23 vs. AFGZX (-1.14). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.75 vs. AFGZX (17.51).
| AFGZX | RNPFX | AFGZX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.46 | 215% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.46 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.253 | 19.552 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.2M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.14 | 14.23 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.57 | 64.59 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.51 | 37.75 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.30 | 102.37 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement