It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.90%.
AFL is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
LNC is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
AFL | LNC | AFL / LNC | |
Capitalization | 49.4B | 5.42B | 912% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 3.210 | 7.788 | 41% |
P/E Ratio | 10.95 | 9.80 | 112% |
Revenue | 18.8B | 11.7B | 161% |
Total Cash | 77.6B | 23B | 337% |
Total Debt | 7.36B | 5.95B | 124% |
AFL | LNC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNC's Valuation (11) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (62). This means that LNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (100). This means that AFL’s stock grew significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (98). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (43). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.
LNC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (13). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.
AFL | LNC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | 1 day ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago52% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago62% | 8 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% | 1 day ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | 1 day ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
AVSD | 58.21 | 0.64 | +1.12% |
Avantis Responsible International Eq ETF | |||
DDM | 103.88 | 0.57 | +0.55% |
ProShares Ultra Dow30 | |||
MDYG | 89.69 | 0.43 | +0.48% |
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | |||
EUSC | 39.79 | 0.17 | +0.43% |
WisdomTree Europe Hedged SmallCap Eq ETF | |||
SNPD | 26.28 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
Xtrackers S&P ESG Div Arstcrts ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.