LNC
Price
$41.08
Change
+$0.07 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.85B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MET
Price
$97.20
Change
+$1.28 (+1.33%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
60.95B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LNC vs MET

LNC vs MET Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LNC vs. MET commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNC is a StrongBuy and MET is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNC vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
LNC
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10025
SMR RATING
1..100
9799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNC's Valuation (8) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (40). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (100). This means that MET’s stock grew significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's SMR Rating (97) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (46). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.

MET's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (90). This means that MET’s stock grew significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNCMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (LNC: $41.01 vs. MET: $95.92)
Brand notoriety: LNC and MET are both notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNC: 91% vs. MET: 77%
Market capitalization -- LNC: $7.85B vs. MET: $60.95B
LNC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $7.85B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $60.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $228.36K to $148.5B. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MET’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than LNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the short-term than LNC.

Price Growth

LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -5.59% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

MET is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-1.05% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
LNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDCC333.767.06
+2.16%
InterDigital
HOWL0.98N/A
+0.20%
Werewolf Therapeutics
TLNC10.24N/A
N/A
Talon Capital Corp
OCCIM25.03-0.02
-0.08%
OFS Credit Company Inc
OCFC17.37-0.20
-1.14%
OceanFirst Financial Corp

LNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNC
1D Price
Change %
LNC100%
-1.61%
MET - LNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
JXN - LNC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
CNO - LNC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
PRU - LNC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
FG - LNC
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
-0.75%
PRU - MET
72%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
LNC - MET
70%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
CNO - MET
66%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
JXN - MET
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
PRI - MET
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
More