LNC
Price
$31.84
Change
+$1.38 (+4.53%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
25 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$84.04
Change
+$2.78 (+3.42%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LNC vs MET

Header iconLNC vs MET Comparison
Open Charts LNC vs METBanner chart's image
Lincoln National
Price$31.84
Change+$1.38 (+4.53%)
Volume$1.23M
CapitalizationN/A
MetLife
Price$84.04
Change+$2.78 (+3.42%)
Volume$4.91M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LNC vs MET Comparison Chart
Loading...
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
LNC vs. MET commentary
Oct 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNC is a Buy and MET is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2024
Stock price -- (LNC: $31.84 vs. MET: $84.04)
Brand notoriety: LNC and MET are both notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LNC: 79% vs. MET: 144%
Market capitalization -- LNC: $5.42B vs. MET: $53.28B
LNC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $5.42B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LNC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than LNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LNC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNC is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNC is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.43% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than LNC($5.42B). MET has higher P/E ratio than LNC: MET (40.71) vs LNC (9.80). MET YTD gains are higher at: 30.134 vs. LNC (23.527). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. LNC (23B). LNC has less debt than MET: LNC (5.95B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than LNC: MET (66.4B) vs LNC (11.7B).
LNCMETLNC / MET
Capitalization5.42B53.3B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.52730.13478%
P/E Ratio9.8040.7124%
Revenue11.7B66.4B18%
Total Cash23B308B7%
Total Debt5.95B18.8B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNC vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
LNC
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1831
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
9799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4816
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNC's Valuation (8) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (38). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (100). This means that MET’s stock grew significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's SMR Rating (97) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (48). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (100). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNCMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUNZ30.300.20
+0.68%
TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF
FTRI13.730.08
+0.59%
First Trust Indxx Glbl Natrl Res Inc ETF
FXED19.21-0.02
-0.11%
Sound Enhanced Fixed Income ETF
JSCP47.14-0.20
-0.42%
JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF
IGLB52.72-0.35
-0.66%
iShares 10+ Year Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF

LNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNC
1D Price
Change %
LNC100%
+4.53%
PRU - LNC
76%
Closely correlated
+3.44%
MET - LNC
72%
Closely correlated
+3.42%
BHF - LNC
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.98%
CNO - LNC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
JXN - LNC
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.66%
More

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with AFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then AFL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
+3.42%
AFL - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
PRU - MET
86%
Closely correlated
+3.44%
LNC - MET
71%
Closely correlated
+4.53%
CNO - MET
71%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
BHF - MET
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.98%
More