AFRM
Price
$71.44
Change
+$3.45 (+5.07%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
24.11B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BTDR
Price
$11.96
Change
+$0.43 (+3.73%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.25B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs BTDR

AFRM vs BTDR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. BTDR commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and BTDR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($24.1B) has a higher market cap than BTDR($3.25B). BTDR YTD gains are higher at: 6.690 vs. AFRM (-4.017). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. BTDR (-90.82M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.6B vs. BTDR (461M). BTDR has less debt than AFRM: BTDR (1.95B) vs AFRM (10B). AFRM has higher revenues than BTDR: AFRM (4.26B) vs BTDR (812M).
AFRMBTDRAFRM / BTDR
Capitalization24.1B3.25B741%
EBITDA1.25B-90.82M-1,376%
Gain YTD-4.0176.690-60%
P/E Ratio12.92N/A-
Revenue4.26B812M525%
Total Cash2.6B461M565%
Total Debt10B1.95B512%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMBTDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $71.44 vs. BTDR: $11.96)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and BTDR are both not notable
AFRM represents the Savings Banks, while BTDR is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 118% vs. BTDR: 60%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $24.11B vs. BTDR: $3.25B
AFRM [@Savings Banks] is valued at $24.11B. BTDR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $1.46M to $696.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $291 to $238.27B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $34.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BTDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BTDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTDR is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BTDR’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BTDR’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTDR is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while BTDR (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

BTDR is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.79% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BTDR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FV72.090.44
+0.62%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
UYM29.270.13
+0.45%
ProShares Ultra Materials
IDRV35.740.12
+0.34%
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
YBMN12.57N/A
N/A
Defiance Bmnr Option Income ETF
VVR2.94-0.01
-0.34%
Invesco Senior Income Trust

BTDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDR has been loosely correlated with CORZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTDR jumps, then CORZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDR
1D Price
Change %
BTDR100%
+3.73%
CORZ - BTDR
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
HOLO - BTDR
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
AFRM - BTDR
46%
Loosely correlated
+5.07%
XYZ - BTDR
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
BULL - BTDR
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More