AFRM
Price
$68.34
Change
-$0.73 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 10, 12:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.43B
42 days until earnings call
CLSK
Price
$12.91
Change
+$0.44 (+3.53%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.78B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs CLSK

Header iconAFRM vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs CLSKBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$68.34
Change-$0.73 (-1.06%)
Volume$2.89K
Capitalization11.43B
CleanSpark
Price$12.91
Change+$0.44 (+3.53%)
Volume$270.08K
Capitalization4.78B
AFRM vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. CLSK commentary
Jul 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a StrongBuy and CLSK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $69.07 vs. CLSK: $12.47)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and CLSK are both not notable
AFRM represents the Packaged Software, while CLSK is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 55% vs. CLSK: 104%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $11.43B vs. CLSK: $4.78B
AFRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.43B. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.10% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.02% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($11.4B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($4.78B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 35.396 vs. AFRM (13.415). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. AFRM (-322M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. CLSK (176M). CLSK has less debt than AFRM: CLSK (15.2M) vs AFRM (6.24B). AFRM has higher revenues than CLSK: AFRM (1.91B) vs CLSK (216M).
AFRMCLSKAFRM / CLSK
Capitalization11.4B4.78B238%
EBITDA-322M60.4M-533%
Gain YTD13.41535.39638%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.91B216M886%
Total Cash1.95B176M1,109%
Total Debt6.24B15.2M41,072%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOTFX11.42N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps R4
FMAGX15.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Magellan
FRESX39.19N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Investment Port
NSDVX21.71N/A
N/A
North Star Dividend I
MFLLX16.78N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception R6

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+1.98%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
+5.36%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
+7.50%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+5.79%
COMP - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.93%
HOOD - AFRM
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+7.50%
RIOT - CLSK
85%
Closely correlated
+5.79%
MARA - CLSK
85%
Closely correlated
+5.37%
BITF - CLSK
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
HIVE - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
COIN - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+5.36%
More