AFRM
Price
$83.08
Change
+$1.67 (+2.05%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
27.06B
53 days until earnings call
COMP
Price
$9.35
Change
-$0.08 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs COMP

Header iconAFRM vs COMP Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs COMPBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$83.08
Change+$1.67 (+2.05%)
Volume$7.06M
Capitalization27.06B
Compass
Price$9.35
Change-$0.08 (-0.85%)
Volume$4.5M
Capitalization4.92B
AFRM vs COMP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. COMP commentary
Sep 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and COMP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $83.08 vs. COMP: $9.35)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and COMP are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while COMP is part of the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 95% vs. COMP: 59%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $27.06B vs. COMP: $4.92B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $27.06B. COMP’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOMP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • COMP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than COMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COMP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • COMP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the short-term than COMP.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -4.89% price change this week, while COMP (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +71.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

COMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+4.05% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Real Estate Development (+3.77% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($27.1B) has a higher market cap than COMP($4.92B). COMP YTD gains are higher at: 59.829 vs. AFRM (36.420). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 712M vs. COMP (46.5M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. COMP (177M). COMP has less debt than AFRM: COMP (547M) vs AFRM (7.85B). COMP has higher revenues than AFRM: COMP (6.29B) vs AFRM (3.22B).
AFRMCOMPAFRM / COMP
Capitalization27.1B4.92B551%
EBITDA712M46.5M1,531%
Gain YTD36.42059.82961%
P/E Ratio553.87N/A-
Revenue3.22B6.29B51%
Total Cash2.23B177M1,258%
Total Debt7.85B547M1,436%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMCOMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BITX59.052.35
+4.14%
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF
HIO3.970.02
+0.51%
Western Asset High Income Opportunity Fund
SHRT7.580.02
+0.20%
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
SPUC49.17-0.05
-0.10%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upsd Cnvxty ETF
CGCV29.86-0.08
-0.27%
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+2.05%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
COMP - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
HOOD - AFRM
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
More

COMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMP
1D Price
Change %
COMP100%
-0.85%
COIN - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AFRM - COMP
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
U - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CLSK - COMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
TDOC - COMP
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More