Advertisement
AFYA vs HERE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYA is a Hold and HERE is a Hold.
AFYA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AFYA | HERE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 24 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while HERE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AFYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HERE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFYA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HERE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFYA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HERE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AFYA (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -12.02% price change this week, while HERE (@Recreational Products) price change was +0.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFYA is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-2.60% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Recreational Products (+1.80% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CRCA | 17.63 | 0.23 | +1.32% |
| ProShares Ultra CRCL (CRCA) | |||
| GEND | 12.87 | 0.10 | +0.76% |
| Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) | |||
| FUTY | 51.31 | 0.26 | +0.51% |
| Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) | |||
| PBNV | 31.82 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) | |||
| BKMS | 24.98 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) | |||
AFYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFYA has been loosely correlated with STRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFYA jumps, then STRA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFYA | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| STRA - AFYA | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| ADT - AFYA | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| DLB - AFYA | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| BCO - AFYA | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| RELX - AFYA | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||
HERE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HERE and EEIQ have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HERE and EEIQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HERE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HERE | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| EEIQ - HERE | 29% Poorly correlated | -11.55% | ||
| FEDU - HERE | 24% Poorly correlated | -9.50% | ||
| WAFU - HERE | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
| AFYA - HERE | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| AMBO - HERE | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||