Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCLX vs CSPAX
AGCLX vs CSPAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCLX vs CSPAX
AGCLX vs CSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCLX vs. CSPAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCLX is a Buy and CSPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCLX (66.7M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than AGCLX: CSPAX (0.62) vs AGCLX (0.42). AGCLX was incepted earlier than CSPAX: AGCLX (10 years) vs CSPAX (24 years). AGCLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). AGCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). AGCLX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCLX: CSPAX (250) vs AGCLX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.72 vs. AGCLX (20.86). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.32 vs. AGCLX (-2.02).
| AGCLX | CSPAX | AGCLX / CSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.04 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.04 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.774 | 16.817 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.7M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.62 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.86 | 23.72 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.44 | 42.58 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.02 | -1.32 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.87 | 104.26 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement