Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCLX vs CSPAX
AGCLX vs CSPAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCLX vs CSPAX
AGCLX vs CSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCLX vs. CSPAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCLX is a Hold and CSPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. AGCLX (58.7M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than AGCLX: CSPAX (0.59) vs AGCLX (0.44). AGCLX was incepted earlier than CSPAX: AGCLX (10 years) vs CSPAX (25 years). AGCLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). AGCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). AGCLX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCLX: CSPAX (250) vs AGCLX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. AGCLX (2.01). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.59 vs. AGCLX (-12.89).
| AGCLX | CSPAX | AGCLX / CSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.04 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.04 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.973 | 12.262 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.7M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.59 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 8.87 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 37.25 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.89 | -9.59 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.18 | 82.39 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement