Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCLX vs RSLAX
AGCLX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCLX vs RSLAX
AGCLX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCLX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCLX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCLX (66.7M). AGCLX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCLX (0.42) vs RSLAX (0.21). AGCLX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCLX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCLX (1.36). AGCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCLX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCLX (2500). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.98 vs. AGCLX (20.86). AGCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.02 vs. RSLAX (-6.60).
| AGCLX | RSLAX | AGCLX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.774 | 16.432 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.7M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.21 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.86 | 21.98 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.44 | 38.67 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.02 | -6.60 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.87 | 83.31 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement