Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCSX vs RSLAX
AGCSX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCSX vs RSLAX
AGCSX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCSX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCSX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. AGCSX (60.1M). AGCSX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCSX (0.84) vs RSLAX (0.17). AGCSX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCSX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCSX (0.91). AGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCSX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCSX (5000000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. AGCSX (5.86). AGCSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.14 vs. RSLAX (-14.89).
| AGCSX | RSLAX | AGCSX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.74 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.74 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.877 | 12.704 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.1M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.17 | 491% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 11.27 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.74 | 30.96 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.14 | -14.89 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.66 | 62.14 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers