Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCSX vs SMCFX
AGCSX vs SMCFX Comparison
Open Charts AGCSX vs SMCFX
AGCSX vs SMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCSX vs. SMCFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCSX is a Hold and SMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. AGCSX (59.3M). AGCSX pays higher dividends than SMCFX: AGCSX (0.84) vs SMCFX (0.80). AGCSX was incepted earlier than SMCFX: AGCSX (10 years) vs SMCFX (18 years). AGCSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SMCFX (0.76). AGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. SMCFX (41.00). SMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCSX: SMCFX (250) vs AGCSX (5000000). SMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.64 vs. AGCSX (3.26). SMCFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.22 vs. AGCSX (-11.04).
| AGCSX | SMCFX | AGCSX / SMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.76 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.76 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.299 | 10.840 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.80 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 8.64 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.52 | 37.04 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.04 | -9.22 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.40 | 83.92 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement