Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCVX vs CSPAX
AGCVX vs CSPAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCVX vs CSPAX
AGCVX vs CSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCVX vs. CSPAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCVX is a Buy and CSPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCVX (62.5M). AGCVX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: AGCVX (0.63) vs CSPAX (0.57). AGCVX was incepted earlier than CSPAX: AGCVX (10 years) vs CSPAX (24 years). AGCVX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). AGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCVX: CSPAX (250) vs AGCVX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. AGCVX (8.42). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -5.25 vs. AGCVX (-7.05).
| AGCVX | CSPAX | AGCVX / CSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.04 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.04 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.181 | 12.262 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.5M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.57 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 13.16 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.57 | 34.02 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.05 | -5.25 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.29 | 88.68 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement