Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCVX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCVX is a Buy and RSLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCVX (62.5M). AGCVX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCVX (0.63) vs RSLAX (0.17). AGCVX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCVX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCVX (1.11). AGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCVX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCVX (2500). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. AGCVX (8.42). AGCVX return over 5 years is better than : -7.05 vs. RSLAX (-10.32).
| AGCVX | RSLAX | AGCVX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.181 | 11.854 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.5M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.17 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 11.58 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.57 | 30.34 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.05 | -10.32 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.29 | 69.30 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers