Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCVX vs. RSLAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCVX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. AGCVX (59.8M). AGCVX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCVX (0.69) vs RSLAX (0.18). AGCVX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCVX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCVX (1.11). AGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCVX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCVX (2500). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.09 vs. AGCVX (7.43). AGCVX return over 5 years is better than : -10.96 vs. RSLAX (-12.07).
| AGCVX | RSLAX | AGCVX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.859 | 9.876 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.8M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.18 | 390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 11.09 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.45 | 23.84 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.96 | -12.07 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.78 | 61.81 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement