Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCVX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCVX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCVX (65.2M). AGCVX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCVX (0.64) vs RSLAX (0.21). AGCVX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCVX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCVX (1.11). AGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCVX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCVX (2500). AGCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. RSLAX (16.26). AGCVX return over 5 years is better than : -3.18 vs. RSLAX (-9.82).
| AGCVX | RSLAX | AGCVX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.969 | 12.802 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.2M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.21 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.53 | 16.26 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 31.40 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.18 | -9.82 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.93 | 75.09 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers