Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCVX vs RSLAX
AGCVX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCVX vs. RSLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCVX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. AGCVX (61.5M). AGCVX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCVX (0.69) vs RSLAX (0.18). AGCVX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCVX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCVX (1.11). AGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCVX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCVX (2500). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. AGCVX (8.71). AGCVX return over 5 years is better than : -5.08 vs. RSLAX (-8.15).
| AGCVX | RSLAX | AGCVX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.572 | 14.061 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.5M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.18 | 390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 13.49 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.25 | 36.50 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | -8.15 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.65 | 63.48 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement