Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCVX vs SMCWX
AGCVX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts AGCVX vs SMCWX
AGCVX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCVX vs. SMCWX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCVX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. AGCVX (61.5M). AGCVX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: AGCVX (0.69) vs SMCWX (0.61). AGCVX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: AGCVX (10 years) vs SMCWX (36 years). AGCVX (1.11) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.03). AGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. SMCWX (41.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCVX: SMCWX (250) vs AGCVX (2500). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. AGCVX (8.71). SMCWX return over 5 years is better than : -2.63 vs. AGCVX (-5.08).
| AGCVX | SMCWX | AGCVX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.03 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.03 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.572 | 14.586 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.5M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.61 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 15.20 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.25 | 40.57 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | -2.63 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.65 | 83.11 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement