Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCWX vs CSPAX
AGCWX vs CSPAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCWX vs CSPAX
AGCWX vs CSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCWX vs. CSPAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCWX is a Hold and CSPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. AGCWX (58.7M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than AGCWX: CSPAX (0.59) vs AGCWX (0.20). AGCWX was incepted earlier than CSPAX: AGCWX (10 years) vs CSPAX (25 years). AGCWX (1.61) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). AGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCWX: CSPAX (250) vs AGCWX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. AGCWX (1.75). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.59 vs. AGCWX (-14.21).
| AGCWX | CSPAX | AGCWX / CSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.04 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.04 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.776 | 12.262 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.7M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.59 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 8.87 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.23 | 37.25 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.21 | -9.59 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.48 | 82.39 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers