Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCWX vs CSPAX
AGCWX vs CSPAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCWX vs CSPAX
AGCWX vs CSPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCWX vs. CSPAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCWX is a Hold and CSPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. AGCWX (61.5M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than AGCWX: CSPAX (0.60) vs AGCWX (0.21). AGCWX was incepted earlier than CSPAX: AGCWX (10 years) vs CSPAX (25 years). AGCWX (1.61) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). AGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCWX: CSPAX (250) vs AGCWX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.10 vs. AGCWX (8.16). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.97 vs. AGCWX (-7.91).
| AGCWX | CSPAX | AGCWX / CSPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.04 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.04 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.215 | 14.567 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.5M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.60 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 15.10 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 40.37 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.91 | -2.97 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.91 | 82.19 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement