Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCWX vs RLLGX
AGCWX vs RLLGX Comparison
Open Charts AGCWX vs RLLGX
AGCWX vs RLLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCWX vs. RLLGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCWX is a Hold and RLLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLLGX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. AGCWX (61.5M). RLLGX pays higher dividends than AGCWX: RLLGX (0.90) vs AGCWX (0.21). AGCWX was incepted earlier than RLLGX: AGCWX (10 years) vs RLLGX (17 years). AGCWX (1.61) is less costly to investors than RLLGX (0.65). AGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RLLGX (41.00). RLLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCWX: RLLGX (250) vs AGCWX (2500). RLLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.82 vs. AGCWX (8.16). RLLGX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. AGCWX (-7.91).
| AGCWX | RLLGX | AGCWX / RLLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.65 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.65 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.215 | 14.864 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.5M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.90 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 15.82 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 42.42 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.91 | -0.62 | 1,270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.91 | 90.37 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement