Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCWX vs RSLAX
AGCWX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCWX vs RSLAX
AGCWX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCWX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCWX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. AGCWX (65.3M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than AGCWX: RSLAX (0.21) vs AGCWX (0.19). AGCWX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCWX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCWX (1.61). AGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCWX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCWX (2500). AGCWX (19.34) and RSLAX (18.70) have marching annual gain over last year. AGCWX return over 5 years is better than : -4.77 vs. RSLAX (-8.40).
| AGCWX | RSLAX | AGCWX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.74 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.74 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.636 | 11.740 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.3M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.34 | 18.70 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.40 | 33.39 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.77 | -8.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.61 | 68.51 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement