Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCWX vs RSLAX
AGCWX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCWX vs RSLAX
AGCWX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCWX vs. RSLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCWX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. AGCWX (61.5M). AGCWX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCWX (0.21) vs RSLAX (0.18). AGCWX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCWX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCWX (1.61). AGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCWX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCWX (2500). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. AGCWX (8.16). AGCWX (-7.91) and RSLAX (-8.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AGCWX | RSLAX | AGCWX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.74 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.74 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.215 | 14.061 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.5M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.18 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 13.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 36.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.91 | -8.15 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.91 | 63.48 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers