Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCWX vs RSLAX
AGCWX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCWX vs RSLAX
AGCWX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCWX vs. RSLAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCWX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. AGCWX (59.8M). AGCWX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCWX (0.21) vs RSLAX (0.18). AGCWX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCWX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCWX (1.61). AGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCWX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCWX (2500). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.09 vs. AGCWX (6.88). RSLAX return over 5 years is better than : -12.07 vs. AGCWX (-13.61).
| AGCWX | RSLAX | AGCWX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.74 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.74 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.557 | 9.876 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.8M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.18 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 11.09 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.54 | 23.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.61 | -12.07 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.28 | 61.81 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers