Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCWX vs RSLEX
AGCWX vs RSLEX Comparison
Open Charts AGCWX vs RSLEX
AGCWX vs RSLEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCWX vs. RSLEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCWX is a Hold and RSLEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLEX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. AGCWX (58.7M). RSLEX pays higher dividends than AGCWX: RSLEX (0.61) vs AGCWX (0.20). AGCWX was incepted earlier than RSLEX: AGCWX (10 years) vs RSLEX (24 years). AGCWX (1.61) is less costly to investors than RSLEX (1.00). AGCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLEX (41.00). RSLEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCWX: RSLEX (250) vs AGCWX (2500). RSLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. AGCWX (1.75). RSLEX return over 5 years is better than : -9.27 vs. AGCWX (-14.21).
| AGCWX | RSLEX | AGCWX / RSLEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.00 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.00 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.776 | 12.299 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.7M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.61 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | 8.96 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.23 | 37.52 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.21 | -9.27 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.48 | 83.16 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement