Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGFCX vs RGAFX
AGFCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGFCX vs RGAFX
AGFCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGFCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFCX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AGFCX (139M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than AGFCX: RGAFX (0.46) vs AGFCX (0.00). AGFCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: AGFCX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). AGFCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AGFCX (8.97). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGFCX: RGAFX (250) vs AGFCX (1000). AGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. RGAFX (4.67). AGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.40 vs. RGAFX (17.46).
| AGFCX | RGAFX | AGFCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.34 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.34 | 597% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.747 | 7.299 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | 4.67 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.81 | 40.73 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.40 | 17.46 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.66 | 105.95 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement