Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGFCX vs RGAFX
AGFCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGFCX vs RGAFX
AGFCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGFCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. AGFCX (135M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than AGFCX: RGAFX (0.46) vs AGFCX (0.00). AGFCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: AGFCX (18 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). AGFCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AGFCX (8.97). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGFCX: RGAFX (250) vs AGFCX (1000). AGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. RGAFX (0.42). AGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.87 vs. RGAFX (14.74).
| AGFCX | RGAFX | AGFCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.34 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.34 | 597% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 9.276 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 0.42 | 352% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.94 | 44.36 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.87 | 14.74 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.82 | 109.80 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers