Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGFCX vs RGAHX
AGFCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts AGFCX vs RGAHX
AGFCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGFCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. AGFCX (135M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than AGFCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs AGFCX (0.00). AGFCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: AGFCX (18 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). AGFCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AGFCX (8.97). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGFCX: RGAHX (250) vs AGFCX (1000). AGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. RGAHX (0.18). AGFCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.87 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| AGFCX | RGAHX | AGFCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.44 | 461% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.44 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 9.200 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 0.18 | 820% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.94 | 43.47 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.87 | 13.78 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.82 | 106.68 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers