Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGFGX vs RNPAX
AGFGX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts AGFGX vs RNPAX
AGFGX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGFGX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFGX is a Hold and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. AGFGX (510M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than AGFGX: RNPAX (0.36) vs AGFGX (0.26). AGFGX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: AGFGX (9 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than AGFGX (0.90). AGFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). AGFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPAX: AGFGX (0) vs RNPAX (250). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.46 vs. AGFGX (-6.30). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.85 vs. AGFGX (-21.51).
| AGFGX | RNPAX | AGFGX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.676 | 5.604 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.36 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.30 | 1.46 | -433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.18 | 35.86 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.51 | 5.85 | -368% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement