Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGFGX vs RNPAX
AGFGX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts AGFGX vs RNPAX
AGFGX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGFGX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFGX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. AGFGX (538M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than AGFGX: RNPAX (0.37) vs AGFGX (0.25). AGFGX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: AGFGX (9 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than AGFGX (0.90). AGFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). AGFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPAX: AGFGX (0) vs RNPAX (250). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. AGFGX (-3.70). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.71 vs. AGFGX (-20.09).
| AGFGX | RNPAX | AGFGX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.772 | 2.639 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 538M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.37 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.70 | 2.05 | -181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.76 | 27.21 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.09 | 4.71 | -426% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement