AGG
Price
$99.32
Change
-$0.17 (-0.17%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Net Assets
135.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BND
Price
$73.64
Change
-$0.11 (-0.15%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Net Assets
387.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGG vs BND

Header iconAGG vs BND Comparison
Open Charts AGG vs BNDBanner chart's image
AGG vs BND Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) vs. Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND)

Key Takeaways

  • Both AGG and BND deliver broad exposure to the U.S. investment-grade bond market with identical 0.03% expense ratios, but differ in benchmark indices: AGG tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while BND follows the float-adjusted version.
  • AGG holds over 13,000 securities with heavier Treasury weighting (46%), while BND's 11,000+ holdings emphasize a sampling approach for liquidity, resulting in higher government allocation around 69%.
  • Top holdings in AGG feature U.S. Treasury (46%) and agency MBS like FNMA (11%), compared to BND's focus on specific agency MBS pools under 2% each, highlighting structural sampling differences.
  • Liquidity profiles are strong for both, with AGG showing higher average daily volume (~8.7M shares) and BND larger AUM (~$389B vs. AGG's $139B), aiding large trades.
  • Performance tracks closely over recent market cycles due to shared exposure, though BND's float adjustment may edge in liquid environments with similar low volatility (beta ~0.98-0.99).
  • Both serve as core fixed-income holdings for diversification, income, and ballast against equity volatility in rate-sensitive portfolios.

Introduction

In the current fixed-income landscape, iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) stand out as premier options for broad U.S. investment-grade bond exposure. These passive ETFs track similar yet distinct benchmarks, offering investors low-cost access to Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities, and corporates. They compete directly as core portfolio building blocks, appealing to those seeking income generation, duration management, and equity diversification amid moderating inflation and Fed policy shifts. Comparing their structures reveals nuanced differences in liquidity, holdings concentration, and index methodology, helping investors align with specific risk and efficiency preferences in today's yield-curve environment.

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) Overview

The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG), issued by BlackRock, is a passive ETF seeking to track the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, a benchmark representing the total U.S. investment-grade bond market. It holds approximately 13,227 securities, providing comprehensive exposure across Treasuries, government-related debt, MBS, ABS, and corporates.

Top holdings include U.S. Treasury (46.02%), Federal National Mortgage Association (11.05%), Government National Mortgage Association II (5.25%), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (5.08%), and Uniform MBS (1.74%). Sector allocations feature Treasuries at 46%, MBS pass-throughs at 23.6%, industrials at 14.4%, and financials at 8%. The expense ratio is 0.03%, with an effective duration of 5.78 years and weighted average maturity of 8.01 years. AGG's full replication approach minimizes tracking error, supported by high liquidity (30-day avg. volume ~8.75M shares). It rebalances in line with the index, emphasizing broad diversification for core fixed-income allocation.

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) Overview

The Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND), managed by Vanguard, tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index using an optimized sampling strategy to match key characteristics like duration and quality. It comprises over 11,429 holdings, focusing on taxable investment-grade bonds with maturities over one year.

Top holdings are agency MBS such as Federal National Mortgage Assn. 2% (1.59%), 2.5% (1.16%), and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. variants (1.09%-0.93%). Allocations tilt heavily to U.S. Government (69.07%), with credit ratings spanning AAA to BBB. The expense ratio matches at 0.03%, with a 36.4% turnover rate and 25-day average volume of ~9.3M shares. BND's float-adjusted benchmark prioritizes liquid issues, enhancing tradability for its massive scale (AUM ~$389B), while maintaining intermediate duration for balanced risk-return in diversified portfolios.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. aggregate bond sector faces a supportive yet cautious environment in recent market cycles, with intermediate-term yields hovering attractively amid Fed rate cuts and resilient growth. Capital flows into fixed-income ETFs hit records in 2025, driven by yields outpacing cash alternatives and diversification demand amid equity volatility. Macro drivers include moderating inflation, fiscal policy support, and AI-fueled capex, tempering aggressive easing expectations. Risks encompass geopolitical tensions, yield curve steepening, and persistent supply pressures from deficits. Regulatory stability bolsters investment-grade appeal, positioning AGG and BND as anchors for income and ballast as investors navigate dispersion in rates and credit.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, AGG and BND have exhibited tightly correlated performance, with year-to-date returns around 0.4% and trailing 12-month gains near 5%, reflecting shared sensitivity to Treasury rallies and MBS spreads. Relative positioning shows minimal divergence, as both benefited from Fed cuts and flight-to-quality flows, though BND's float adjustment provided slight liquidity edges in volatile sessions. Volatility profiles align closely (standard deviation ~5.2%, beta ~0.98-0.99), with max drawdowns differing by mere basis points in stress periods like 2022. AGG's fuller replication may capture more index nuance in stable cycles, while BND's sampling shines amid sector rotation toward liquid government debt. Both offer consistent income amid interest rate expectations and macro shifts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's strongest performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across equities, ETFs, and more, with varying strategies, timeframes from intraday to multi-week holds, and performance metrics like annualized returns (+16.89% to +214.35%), win rates (53%-95%), and profit factors (1.57-25.83%). Featured bots target diverse symbols including stocks like JPM, GS, semiconductors, industrials, and leveraged ETFs such as SOXL. This dynamic leaderboard highlights top performers by drawdown, duration, and consistency. Investors can explore these for automated trading insights—visit the page to discover bots aligning with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors BND with moderate conviction (55-60% probability edge) due to its superior scale (larger AUM), float-adjusted liquidity profile, and sampling efficiency in recent cycles favoring liquid government-heavy exposure. While AGG offers precise index tracking and robust trading volume, BND's structural emphasis on tradable issues better positions it amid ongoing capital flows and dispersion risks. This assessment weighs cost parity, diversification depth, and momentum in intermediate core bond sector trends, absent personal advice considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AGG vs. BND commentary
Apr 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGG is a Hold and BND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BND has more net assets: 387B vs. AGG (136B). AGG has a higher annual dividend yield than BND: AGG (0.416) vs BND (0.393). AGG was incepted earlier than BND: AGG (23 years) vs BND (19 years). AGG (0.03) and BND (0.03) have comparable expense ratios . AGG has a higher turnover BND (38.00) vs BND (38.00).
AGGBNDAGG / BND
Gain YTD0.4160.393106%
Net Assets136B387B35%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.03100%
Turnover81.0038.00213%
Yield3.933.91101%
Fund Existence23 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGGBND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETO28.690.29
+1.02%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Div Oppor Fund
SFEB24.510.03
+0.12%
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Mod Buf ETF-Feb
LMBS49.990.01
+0.02%
First Trust Low Duration Oppos ETF
LAPR25.28N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Inc 15 Bffr ETF - Aprl
MSII6.33-0.01
-0.12%
REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF