Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGGWX vs FGDCX
AGGWX vs FGDCX Comparison
Open Charts AGGWX vs FGDCX
AGGWX vs FGDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGGWX vs. FGDCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGGWX is a Hold and FGDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. AGGWX (1.82B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than AGGWX: FGDCX (4.21) vs AGGWX (0.31). AGGWX was incepted earlier than FGDCX: AGGWX (19 years) vs FGDCX (20 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than AGGWX (1.16). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. AGGWX (20.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGGWX: FGDCX (0) vs AGGWX (2500). FGDCX (40.53) and AGGWX (39.89) have marching annual gain over last year. AGGWX return over 5 years is better than : 215.38 vs. FGDCX (167.90).
| AGGWX | FGDCX | AGGWX / FGDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.69 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.69 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.925 | 16.308 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 4.44B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 4.21 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.89 | 40.53 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 264.40 | 232.09 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.38 | 167.90 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 266.12 | 191.83 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement