Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGGWX vs FGDCX
AGGWX vs FGDCX Comparison
Open Charts AGGWX vs FGDCX
AGGWX vs FGDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGGWX vs. FGDCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGGWX is a Buy and FGDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDCX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. AGGWX (1.69B). FGDCX pays higher dividends than AGGWX: FGDCX (4.68) vs AGGWX (0.44). AGGWX was incepted earlier than FGDCX: AGGWX (19 years) vs FGDCX (19 years). FGDCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than AGGWX (1.16). FGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. AGGWX (20.00). FGDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGGWX: FGDCX (0) vs AGGWX (2500). AGGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.11 vs. FGDCX (57.95). AGGWX return over 5 years is better than : 134.48 vs. FGDCX (101.94).
| AGGWX | FGDCX | AGGWX / FGDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.69 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.69 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.704 | 3.687 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 4.23B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 4.68 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.11 | 57.95 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 191.91 | 166.43 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.48 | 101.94 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 245.15 | 179.26 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement