Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGGWX vs FSAGX
AGGWX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts AGGWX vs FSAGX
AGGWX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGGWX vs. FSAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGGWX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. AGGWX (1.82B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than AGGWX: FSAGX (4.29) vs AGGWX (0.31). AGGWX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: AGGWX (19 years) vs FSAGX (41 years). AGGWX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. AGGWX (20.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGGWX: FSAGX (0) vs AGGWX (2500). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.00 vs. AGGWX (39.89). AGGWX return over 5 years is better than : 215.38 vs. FSAGX (181.93).
| AGGWX | FSAGX | AGGWX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.64 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.64 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.925 | 17.159 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 4.44B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 4.29 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.89 | 42.00 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 264.40 | 242.58 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.38 | 181.93 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 266.12 | 219.05 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement