In today's dynamic precious metals sector, investors and traders frequently evaluate AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) against PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp.) for insights into relative performance and market positioning. These mid-cap miners offer distinct exposures—pure-play gold for AGI and diversified silver-gold production for PAAS—amid fluctuating commodity prices driven by inflation hedges and geopolitical tensions. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for swing traders capturing momentum shifts, long-term investors building sector allocations, and those assessing gold versus silver outperformance in recent market activity.
Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) is a mid-tier gold producer with key operations in Canada and Mexico, focusing on low-cost, high-margin assets like the Island Gold mine. In recent weeks, AGI shares have navigated mixed performance, experiencing short-term pullbacks from multi-year highs yet appearing attractive on valuation metrics. Influencing factors include analyst target increases to C$80, the filing of a technical report for Island Gold district expansion, and completion of annual filings ahead of Q1 2026 results. Positive sentiment stems from robust profit margins (nearly 49%) and return on equity (22%), bolstered by gold price strength, though shares remain sensitive to broader market corrections.
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is a leading silver producer with gold operations across Latin America, Canada, and beyond, including flagship assets like La Colorada and Jacobina. Recent market activity has seen PAAS shares dip amid broader gains but maintain upward trajectory from record 2025 financials, including $554M cash flow from operations and $980M net earnings. Key developments feature a positive La Colorada Skarn preliminary economic assessment (PEA) and Q1 2026 results announcement. Sentiment reflects silver's volatility premium over gold, with strong all-in sustaining costs (AISC) momentum supporting performance despite geopolitical risks in multiple jurisdictions.
Tickeron features over 350 AI Trading Bots that scan thousands of tickers, employing diverse strategies from short-term scalping (1-day holds) to long-term trends (up to 55-day averages), with varying timeframes and styles like trend-following or volatility plays. The curated Trending AI Robots page highlights the top 25 best-suited to current conditions, showcasing impressive stats: annualized returns ranging 15% to 168%, win rates from 48% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 21. These bots trade sectors including gold miners (e.g., NEM, AU), offering tailored performance data to match market environments. Traders can explore and copy these high performers to optimize strategies.
AGI and PAAS both thrive on precious metals prices but differ in focus: AGI's concentrated gold portfolio yields higher margins in pure-play scenarios, while PAAS's diversified silver-gold mix (with zinc/lead byproducts) provides broader revenue streams across eight countries. Growth drivers contrast with AGI's mine expansions versus PAAS's integration post-acquisitions and PEAs. Recent momentum favors AGI YTD but PAAS over one year. Risks include commodity beta (PAAS at 1.53 vs. AGI's 1.35) and PAAS's higher geopolitical exposure. Market sentiment tilts positive for both amid gold/silver rallies, with trade-offs in stability versus upside potential.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PAAS with higher probability for outperformance, driven by superior long-term trend consistency, record cash flows, larger scale, and silver's leverage to industrial demand alongside gold hedges. While AGI exhibits stronger recent stability and analyst support, PAAS's relative positioning suggests greater upside in sustained precious metals strength.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AGI (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.20%.
AGI is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AGI | PAAS | AGI / PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 14.8B | 20.3B | 73% |
| EBITDA | 1.55B | 2.22B | 70% |
| Gain YTD | -8.576 | -6.535 | 131% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.02 | 15.19 | 92% |
| Revenue | 2.07B | 4B | 52% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.61B | - |
| Total Debt | 220M | 845M | 26% |
AGI | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AGI (30). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AGI’s over the last 12 months.
AGI's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (59). This means that AGI’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
AGI's SMR Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (45). This means that AGI’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AGI (63). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AGI’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AGI (98). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AGI’s over the last 12 months.
| AGI | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGI has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AGI jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS | 100% | +3.46% | ||
| WPM - PAAS | 89% Closely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| AEM - PAAS | 87% Closely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| KGC - PAAS | 86% Closely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| CDE - PAAS | 85% Closely correlated | +4.88% | ||
| IAG - PAAS | 84% Closely correlated | +3.16% | ||
More | ||||