Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGOCX vs CWGCX
AGOCX vs CWGCX Comparison
Open Charts AGOCX vs CWGCX
AGOCX vs CWGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGOCX vs. CWGCX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGOCX is a Buy and CWGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. AGOCX (874M). AGOCX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: AGOCX (1.17) vs CWGCX (0.71). AGOCX was incepted earlier than CWGCX: AGOCX (29 years) vs CWGCX (25 years). AGOCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. AGOCX (5.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGOCX: CWGCX (250) vs AGOCX (1000). AGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.92 vs. CWGCX (15.18). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. AGOCX (22.95).
| AGOCX | CWGCX | AGOCX / CWGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.48 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.48 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.146 | 14.930 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 874M | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.71 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.92 | 15.18 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.68 | 48.91 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 30.17 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.88 | 94.61 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers