Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGOCX vs CWGFX
AGOCX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts AGOCX vs CWGFX
AGOCX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGOCX vs. CWGFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGOCX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. AGOCX (824M). CWGFX (1.29) and AGOCX (1.24) have matching dividends . AGOCX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: AGOCX (29 years) vs CWGFX (26 years). AGOCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. AGOCX (5.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGOCX: CWGFX (250) vs AGOCX (1000). CWGFX (11.47) and AGOCX (11.05) have marching annual gain over last year. CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. AGOCX (16.45).
| AGOCX | CWGFX | AGOCX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.79 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.79 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.628 | 15.977 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.29 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.05 | 11.47 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.09 | 51.55 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.45 | 32.66 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.33 | 97.07 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement