Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGQ vs BDGS
AGQ vs BDGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGQ vs. BDGS commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGQ is a Hold and BDGS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGQ has more net assets: 687M vs. BDGS (36.5M). AGQ has a higher annual dividend yield than BDGS: AGQ (39.293) vs BDGS (4.233). AGQ was incepted earlier than BDGS: AGQ (17 years) vs BDGS (2 years). BDGS (0.88) has a lower expense ratio than AGQ (0.95).
| AGQ | BDGS | AGQ / BDGS | |
| Gain YTD | 39.293 | 4.233 | 928% |
| Net Assets | 687M | 36.5M | 1,882% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.88 | 108% |
| Turnover | N/A | 209.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.77 | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AGQ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FINS | 13.00 | 0.19 | +1.48% |
| Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust | |||
| AMOM | 45.27 | 0.19 | +0.42% |
| QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF | |||
| SYLD | 65.11 | 0.23 | +0.35% |
| Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| BKLN | 20.90 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Invesco Senior Loan ETF | |||
| PTBD | 19.70 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF | |||
BDGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDGS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDGS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDGS | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| META - BDGS | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| TSLA - BDGS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| NVDA - BDGS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| AVGO - BDGS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| PLTR - BDGS | 53% Loosely correlated | -9.37% | ||
More | ||||