Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGRDX vs GFAFX
AGRDX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGRDX vs GFAFX
AGRDX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGRDX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRDX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AGRDX (15.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AGRDX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AGRDX (0.00). AGRDX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AGRDX (13 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than AGRDX (0.61). AGRDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). AGRDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: AGRDX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. AGRDX (0.92). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. AGRDX (14.09).
| AGRDX | GFAFX | AGRDX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.65 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.65 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.677 | 7.134 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.92 | 4.25 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.37 | 39.15 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.09 | 15.72 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.15 | 102.45 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement