Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGRFX vs GFACX
AGRFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts AGRFX vs GFACX
AGRFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGRFX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRFX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. AGRFX (1.51B). AGRFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . AGRFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: AGRFX (36 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than AGRFX (1.10). AGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGRFX: GFACX (250) vs AGRFX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.76 vs. AGRFX (-7.16). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 4.53 vs. AGRFX (-8.31).
| AGRFX | GFACX | AGRFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.940 | 8.945 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | 0.76 | -947% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.43 | 38.50 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.31 | 4.53 | -183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.08 | 79.71 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement