Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGRFX vs GFAFX
AGRFX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGRFX vs GFAFX
AGRFX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGRFX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRFX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. AGRFX (1.45B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AGRFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AGRFX (0.00). AGRFX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AGRFX (36 years) vs GFAFX (26 years). AGRFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). AGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGRFX: GFAFX (250) vs AGRFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. AGRFX (-12.59). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. AGRFX (-10.44).
| AGRFX | GFAFX | AGRFX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.765 | 9.043 | 31% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.59 | 0.02 | -51,555% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.23 | 42.74 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.44 | 13.04 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.40 | 106.25 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement