Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGRFX vs GFAFX
AGRFX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGRFX vs GFAFX
AGRFX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGRFX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRFX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. AGRFX (1.55B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AGRFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AGRFX (0.00). AGRFX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AGRFX (36 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). AGRFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). AGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGRFX: GFAFX (250) vs AGRFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. AGRFX (0.92). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. AGRFX (-0.94).
| AGRFX | GFAFX | AGRFX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.063 | 8.691 | 70% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.92 | 12.03 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.68 | 48.36 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.94 | 18.91 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.29 | 117.77 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers