Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGRFX vs GFAFX
AGRFX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGRFX vs GFAFX
AGRFX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGRFX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRFX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AGRFX (1.56B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AGRFX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AGRFX (0.00). AGRFX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AGRFX (36 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). AGRFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). AGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGRFX: GFAFX (250) vs AGRFX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. AGRFX (-3.90). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. AGRFX (-4.29).
| AGRFX | GFAFX | AGRFX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.559 | 7.134 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.90 | 4.25 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.20 | 39.15 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.29 | 15.72 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.77 | 102.45 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement